The Standard · Research and Insight
Systematic Literature Reviews
Runs systematic literature reviews with AI and confirms every included study exists and says what is claimed.
You plan searches, screen studies, extract findings, and synthesise evidence for research, policy, or clinical decisions. An AI assistant can speed screening and reveal patterns, but it can invent citations, misread eligibility, or distort findings.
The exam for Systematic Literature Reviews is not open yet. A skill opens once its questions are approved and tested.
What it measures
Whatever the skill, the exam rates your work in the same six areas of the Standard. Three are for the value you get from the assistant, and three for the control you keep. Each area gets one of 4 ratings (Emerging, Developing, Proficient, Accomplished). For Systematic Literature Reviews, a strong performance looks like this. What each area includes and excludes.
Value
What you get from the assistant: how far it takes the work, how well you brief it, and the piece you hand in.
- Reaching further
You use the reply to expose competing findings, unanswered questions, alternatives, and gaps your review would otherwise miss.
Using the assistant to produce work beyond what you could have produced alone, rather than the same work faster.
- Briefing the assistant
You brief the assistant with the review question, eligibility criteria, source records, extraction fields, and required evidence-table format.
Giving the assistant the reader, purpose and source facts the work depends on, and the form, length and contents you need back.
- The finished piece
You turn screening and extraction outputs into a coherent evidence synthesis with transparent reasoning, appropriate comparisons, and review-ready conclusions.
Turning the assistant's output into something a colleague could use: editing it, combining it and adding original thinking.
Control
What you keep in hand: checking its work, keeping information safe, and deciding what stays with a person.
- Checking its work
You verify each included study, claim, figure, and extracted field against its source before accepting the synthesis.
Checking the assistant's claims, figures and assumptions against the source before the work is used.
- Safety and confidentiality
You keep participant details, restricted manuscripts, and identifiable research data out of the assistant and the delivered review.
Handling confidential and personal data, seeing compliance, ethical and reputational risk, and declining unsafe requests.
- Knowing what to delegate
You decide which screening and extraction steps the assistant receives, while retaining eligibility, inclusion, and synthesis judgements.
Deciding what to hand to the assistant and what to keep, and at what stakes, before any output exists.
What you do in the exam
Every skill of the Standard is examined the same way, at the same pass mark, in the Applied AI Badge. Two tasks with the assistant and two sets of questions, over 15 minutes. You do real work with an AI assistant beside you, hand in what you would send, then answer follow-up questions about your own work.
- 01
A reproducible search strategy from a review question, databases, synonyms, and inclusion criteria.
- 02
An evidence table from included studies, extracted outcomes, source documents, and missing-data notes.
- 03
A synthesis narrative from verified study findings, quality judgements, conflicting results, and research gaps.
These are the kinds of task the exam sets. Your exam draws its own from a bank the Examination Board has approved.
- Exam
- Applied AI Badge
- Price
- US$19
- Length
- 15 minutes
- Attempts
- One for each purchase, then a 7-day wait
What the badge certifies
What an employer reads
Passed an Institute exam in systematic literature reviews. They briefed the assistant with eligibility criteria and source records, caught invented studies, and delivered a verified evidence synthesis.
You earn it in one exam, never by finishing a course.
- Name on the certificate
- Applied AI Badge: Systematic Literature Reviews
- Who it is for
- Researchers, evidence reviewers, clinical analysts, and policy advisers conducting literature reviews.
- Valid for
- 2 years, then renew
- Verification
- Every badge has a public verification page an employer can open, and a place in the public register if you choose it.
- Marked by
- An AI examiner marks your work against a marking guide and quotes your own words as evidence. A person checks anything borderline.
Near it in the Standard
- Academic Research
Conducts academic research with AI and verifies every source and claim.
- Market Research
Runs market research with AI and separates evidence from confident guesswork.
- Policy Research
Researches policy with AI and confirms every citation against the primary text.
- Academic Writing
Writes academically with AI's help, with sources real, cited and read.
- Critical Evaluation
Evaluates claims and evidence critically with and about AI.
- Customer Research & Insight
Gathers customer insight with AI and checks that the synthesis reflects what customers said.
- Competitor Analysis
Analyses competitors with AI and verifies the facts before they shape strategy.
- Qualitative Research Methods
Applies qualitative methods with AI support and keeps interpretation rigorous and human.
Everything in Research and Insight, including the level exams that name the whole function.
Practise it before you pay for it
Practice is free (up to 50 sessions a day) and shaped like the exam, with a coach that tells you what to change. It never counts towards a credential, and an exercise you practised is kept out of your exam.
Want to learn it first? AI+ Systematic Literature Reviews covers this skill. No book is required to pass.